Webb3 How to calculate time periods in these Rules (1) For the purpose of calculating any period of time in terms of these Rules - (a) day means a calendar day; and (b) the first day is excluded and the last day is included, subject to sub-rule (2). (2) The last day of any period must be excluded if it falls on a Saturday, Sunday, Webb9 juli 2024 · Jul 09, 2024 New Ruling may remove a Commissioner’s discretion to grant legal representation at CCMA. According to Rule 25 of the Rules for the Conduct of Proceedings before the CCMA, a legal representative is not permitted to represent a party at proceedings if the dispute concerns a dismissal which relates to misconduct or …
STAATSKOERANT, 7 DESEMBER 2024 No. 42092 89 - Gov
Webb(5) A notice of cross-appeal must be delivered within 10 days, or such longer period as may on good cause be allowed, after receiving notice of appeal from the appellant. [Subrule … Webb2.3. This discretion is reflected in the amended Rule 35 of the CCMA Rules. 2.4 During the last review of the Rules, Rule 35(1) was amended to provide that the Commission or a commissioner may condone any failure to comply with any provision of the Rules, on good cause shown. 2.5 A new sub-rule 35(2) was also added, which states that a ... hukum bacaan ikhfa ada berapa
CCMA Rules amended: Effective from March 1, 2024 - GilesFiles
Webb3.3 Proof of service in terms of rule 3.2 shall serve as a prima facie proof that the contents of the document concerned have come to the knowledge of the party on which it was served ; provided that the CCMA or the Commissioner has a discretion to make any order as to service that he, she or it deems fit. Webbto declare Rule 25(1)(c) of the rules of the CCMA unconstitutional.6 The thrust of the Law Society's argument was that Rule 25(1)(c) is irrational and arbitrary. As the Law Society argued, the basis of the irrationality lies in the fact that Rule 25(1)(c) does not affect the rights conferred in Rule 25(1)(b)7 in relation to the other categories of Webb24 nov. 2024 · In the absence of convincing proof and argument, the CCMA’s rescission ruling is likely to be upheld by the Labour Court. In Kungwini Residential Estate & Adventure Sport Centre Ltd v Mhlongo NO & others (2005) 15 LAC 6.13.1 a case of constructive dismissal was referred to the CCMA by the third respondent. hukum bacaan az zumar ayat 53